According to the analysis presented, waiting for Takefusa Kubo is an obligation.
The analysis laments a haste which, in football, devours projects and produces improvised diagnoses after 90 minutes. It considers it tempting to discard a player too quickly as soon as he loses his starting place. However, it argues that the bench currently occupied by Kubo should be seen as an interlude requiring patience, rather than a sentence. In the broader context of Real Sociedad, it believes the club cannot lightly do without its most distinctive talent and that abandoning its faith in the Japanese player would be an unaffordable luxury.
In the early part of this season and over the recent months referred to, the available data would explain Pellegrino Matarazzo’s caution. In this tactical context, the coach would be seeking a pragmatic collective, strong in pressing and dangerous in transition, a framework in which Take’s profile of combination play and dribbling in static situations is currently struggling to fit from the outset. In the context described at Mestalla, restricting number 14 to a marginal role is presented as a worrying sign. The analysis recalls that Kubo is among the players capable of winning a match on their own when they light up. It does not argue that he should have played, but warns that this situation must not become a habit. In the context reported at Zubieta, the dressing room would consider his attitude beyond reproach and his commitment in training total.
In this reading, his commitment and a quality regarded as unquestionable point to a clear path: he must be given time. Real Sociedad would need the speed, dribbling and creativity of an unpredictable player to unlock tight matches. According to this analysis, the break with Japan will restore his rhythm and confidence, and Matarazzo will have to find him a place upon his return. It concludes that having Take Kubo in the squad is a privilege, but allowing him to fade on the bench is a luxury the club cannot afford.
Comments